Only this isn’t what the 2005 deposition says.
First, let’s be clear: Cosby loves beautiful women, and they love him right back. Nothing wrong with that–unless you are the liberal media.
Question the source: the document was created by one of Bill Cosby’s accusers. It makes far-from-objective statements like “[Bill Cosby’s] testimony become [sic] more and more unbelievable” (page 20). We’re talking about one woman–one–not “women” plural. Even though the entire media uses the word “women,” on page 7, the witness−presumably, Bill Cosby−makes it clear he is referring to one “[w]oman, meaning T—–, and not women.” Few if any of the articles seem to point out this tiny detail.
Bill Cosby allegedly gave Quaaludes to a woman in 1976. Your friend, Google, says that Quaaludes became illegal in 1984. In the 1970’s, Quaaludes were legal, and popular. In the 1970’s, “‘Luding out’ where Quaaludes were taken with wine, became a popular college pastime.”
The lawyers and witness appear to be discussing the same woman when the narrator of the deposition−evidently a lawyer for one of the accusers−reveals that that woman, when she was 19, “met defendant who had sex with her after giving her Quaaludes” (page 14). The narrator chooses not to give us that woman’s exact quote−one can guess why−but the question is moot since the witness says, “That’s her statement. I don’t know.”
