£49bn We Pay For Children Who Can’t Celebrate Father’s Day

The devastating financial – and human – cost of our fatherless society

By Peter Hitchens: By the end of his or her childhood, a British boy or girl is much more likely to have a TV set in the bedroom than a father at home.

Our 45-year national war against traditional family life has been so successful that almost 50 per cent of 15-year-olds no longer live with both their parents.
At the same time we have indulged our neglected and abandoned young with electronics, so that 79 per cent of children aged between five and 16 have a TV in their room.

As we soppily mark ‘Father’s Day’ with cards, socks, sentimentality and meals out, we should remember that in almost all cases the absent parent is the father. There is no doubt about the facts here. Let me list some of them.
The cost of our wild, unprecedented national experiment in fatherlessness is now £49 billion each year – more than the defence budget.

'The State spends billions, and intervenes incessantly, to try to replace the lost force of fatherhood, and it fails.'

We Need Great Historians Like David Irving - Our Knowledge Of WW2 Completely Wrong Thanks To Jewish Propaganda

"The history of WW II is incorrect ... it glorifies the victors and demonizes the vanquished ... Irving’s histories are far more accurate than those written by court historians ... (who) teamed up with Zionists to smear and demonize the best historian of our time."

By Dr. Paul Craid Roberts: Ron Unz is one of the best men of our time. He searches for truth and he supports others who do the same. In this article, he comes to the defense of David Irving, the best historian of the 20th century.http://www.unz.com/announcement/the-remarkable-historiography-of-david-irving/
Churchill's career was funded by wealthy Jews who wanted war with Germany. Why do popular films and biographies hide this shocking fact?
Zionists destroyed David Irving’s livelihood with slander and libel, because he made public a letter from the former chancellor of Germany, Hitler’s predecessor, to Winston Churchill, a letter that Irving found in the American publisher’s file of Winston Churchill’s history of the war, and which the publisher prevented Churchill from publishing in his history.

Delete Facebook! Create Secure Social Media Platform

Max and Stacy discuss Treasury bill yields, FAANG shares and stock market ‘crash insurance with an expiration date.’ In the second half, Max and Stacy continue talking about Facebook and their plan to introduce advertising to WhatsApp, despite their 2014 promises not to do that. They also discuss Kim Dotcom’s call for competitors to Twitter and Facebook. Stacy ditches Twitter for Minds.com and Max recounts a story from Times Square.

Israel Is Not A Democracy

By lan Pappe: Israel is not the only democracy in the Middle East. In fact, it's not a democracy at all.
In the eyes of many Israelis and their supporters worldwide — even those who might criticize some of its policies — Israel is, at the end of the day, a benign democratic state, seeking peace with its neighbors, and guaranteeing equality to all its citizens.
Those who do criticize Israel assume that if anything went wrong in this democracy then it was due to the 1967 war. In this view, the war corrupted an honest and hardworking society by offering easy money in the occupied territories, allowing messianic groups to enter Israeli politics, and above all else turning Israel into an occupying and oppressive entity in the new territories.
The myth that a democratic Israel ran into trouble in 1967 but still remained a democracy is propagated even by some notable Palestinian and pro-Palestinian scholars — but it has no historical foundation.

Israel Before 1967 Was Not a Democracy

Trouble Clef

'If liberty can be defined as the right to offend, Britain has voluntarily removed itself from the free world.'

By Gilad Atzmon: The Jewish Chronicle seems dismayed that the singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz has escaped jail time, at least for the time being. But the message conveyed by Ms. Chabloz’s conviction is devastating for Britain. This kingdom has, in just a short time, become a crude authoritarian state.
For posting so-called ‘grossly offensive songs’ on the internet, Chabloz was sentenced by District Judge John Zani to 20 weeks imprisonment suspended for two years. It seems that now music is deemed a major threat to Britain.
Chabloz was also banned from posting anything on social media for 12 months. I am perplexed. What kind of countries pre-vet social interaction and intellectual exchange? Israel imposes such prohibitions on its Palestinian citizens. Soviet Russia banned certain types of gatherings and publications and, of course, Nazi Germany saw itself qualified to decide what type of texts were healthy for the people and actively burned books.  I guess that Britain is in good company.
Chabloz was further “ordered to complete 180 hours of unpaid work.” This amounts to something in the proximity of 90 Jazz gigs. And Chabloz is required to attend ‘a 20-day rehabilitation programme.’ In 21st century Britain,  a singer songwriter has been sentenced to ‘re-education’ for singing a few tunes that offended some people.

The End Of Judicial Impartiality: Feminists Come For Judges

StudioBrule: It was said to be a test of the political power of the #MeToo movement: the campaign to recall Judge Aaron Persky for his supposedly lenient sentence in the Brock Turner, Stanford University sexual assault trial. Now Judge Persky has been removed from the bench and replaced by a woman.

UN Condemns Jewish State Israel’s ‘Excessive Use Of Force’ In Gaza On Semites, Rejects Amendment Denouncing Hamas

Yet again, Nikki Haley puppets the Israeli narrative – “the UN is always picking on Israel,” “condemn Hamas” – standing nearly alone against world opinion. Not only did the resolution condemning Israel pass, but the amendment condemning Hamas failed to pass. Score one more for justice. Here's some hasbara on the subject:

By Amir Tibon and Reuters, Ha’aretz: The UN General Assembly passed a resolution Wednesday night condemning Israel for excessive use of force against Palestinian civilians and proposing forming an international protection mechanism in Gaza.

The resolution is not expected to lead to action against Israel since any attempt to bring such a decision to the Security Council is expected to be met with a U.S. veto.

The resolution passed with 120 countries in favor, eight against, and 45 abstaining. It was put forward in the General Assembly by Algeria, Turkey and the Palestinians.

U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley criticized the General Assembly for discussing the situation in Gaza instead of the crises in Nicaragua, Yemen and Burma.

Suffragette Myth That Turns Men Into The Enemy

By Belinda Brown: As thousands took to the streets last Sunday to commemorate the centenary of votes for women, many held banners calling for the ‘battle’ to continue. The battle referred to was that of the suffragettes, the gender freedom fighter heroines today’s young women are taught uncritically to believe in.
‘Fight like a Girl’ read one placard read. ‘Deeds, not words’ said another, echoing the slogan of the suffragettes, who were responsible for 337 acts of arson or bombing during 1913 and 1914.
Nothing, from Hollywood’s outpourings to the constant BBC tributes to the suffragettes, seems ever to be said to disabuse young women of the suffragettes’ virtues. Nothing is told them of the real heroines – and the men who helped them – the quite different, peaceful and effective suffragist campaign.
So three cheers for Man on Fire and the Daily Mail which today have published my account of the history of the campaign for women’s rights – one that I believe is accurate and sets the record straight:
‘The real action did not lie with the suffragettes and their shameful violence. It lay with another group of women, the suffragists led by Millicent Fawcett, and their collaboration with men in the Labour party.

Illegal Jewish Israel's Illegal Actions In Illegally Occupied East Jerusalem And Palestine - United Nations General Assembly

UN General Assembly: 10th emergency special session
The General Assembly, Recalling its relevant resolutions regarding the question of Palestine, Recalling also its relevant resolutions on the protection of civilians.

“Blah, blah, you are colluding with a terrorist organisation,
blah, blah, you are empowering Hamas [the elected representatives of the imprisoned, ravaged, pillaged and systematically exterminated indigenous Semitic population].” The Jewish apartheid State Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon whined in defence of his Jewish supremacist state's indefensible inhuman actions, attempting to sway the General Assembly before the vote.

The Myth Of Female Voicelessness

By Mark Dent: Feminists lie all the time. They don’t misspeak or misinterpret the facts. They know they are lying and they know that they continually get away with it because no-one has the courage or the public platform to call them out when they do.
The very fact that no-one in our media or government dares to point out the truth demonstrates where the real power resides.
One line often spoken by ranting feminists in debates or lectures in universities and the media is that women to this very day have no voice. To prove this assertion, they point to the number of men in positions of power in our government and compare that to the number of women. It always seems a little ironic that so many women in powerful public positions are those who complain most loudly of their lack of voice.
Women only constitute one third of all politicians they proclaim. This clearly shows men still dominate our society. Men hold the power. Most men sit in silence, apparently shamed by the stunning clarity of this argument.
They are either cowards or stupid fools.
My first response to this ridiculous assertion would be this.  Please point out to me exactly how men as a group, have benefited by the fact that there are more men in governmental positions. The answer is of course, there have been absolutely no benefits or advantages afforded to males despite their dominance in the political sphere.

Stop Teaching Girls That Men Are The Enemy

'it was not 'votes for women’, but ‘votes for ladies’.'

By Belinda Brown: They’re the heroines of the hour. The brave women who fought so hard to win us the equality we enjoy today. Ask any schoolgirl who won women the vote 100 years ago and they will be quick to answer: ‘The suffragettes.’

They’ve been the subject of a Hollywood film starring Meryl Streep, they feature in girls’ bedtime stories, and last week, Emmeline Pankhurst and her corseted followers were lionised in a BBC documentary presented by historian Lucy Worsley.

Such is the hero-worship of this band of ‘gender freedom fighters’ that when last Sunday thousands took to the streets to commemorate the centenary of votes for women, many were holding banners calling for the ‘battle’ to continue.

‘Fight like a Girl’ read one (right). ‘Deeds, not words’ said another, echoing the slogan of the suffragettes, who were responsible for 337 acts of arson or bombing during 1913-1914 alone. But while gaining the vote 100 years ago was a huge achievement, I also believe that it’s time we started telling young people the truth.

For the real action did not lie with the suffragettes and their shameful violence. It lay with another group of women, the suffragists led by Millicent Fawcett, and their collaboration with men in the Labour party.

How Feminists Developed ‘Toxic Masculinity’

By Elizabeth Hobson: A man named Wisdom asked me a great question today: how did gender activists come up with the term ‘toxic masculinity’? After giving it some thought, I have identified the falling of three dominoes that I think have contributed to the explosion of the term in popular culture.
The innate human suspicion and critical view of men (especially as compared to women), added to the hegemony of the feminist perspective (and their revisionism of history), and the fact that several generations of Western women have not sent their men off to potentially die for our security has made us susceptible to the myth of ‘toxic masculinity’.
Men exist in dominance hierarchies. A very traditional dominance hierarchy would be strength or hunting skills. The strongest men and best hunters would acquire prestige and status which would give them access to the best females for mating with. In our modern societies, many men exist in many dominance hierarchies, they could be based on wealth, or intelligence – even gaming and trainspotting appeal to men’s instinct to compete in dominance hierarchies. According to Gad Saad;

Women are attracted to “toxic masculine” male phenotypes that correlate with testosterone, and they are desirous of men who are socially dominant, who are strategically risk-taking in their behaviors, and who exhibit patterns of behaviors that will allow them to ascend the social hierarchy and defend their positions from encroachers.”