The Doc: When
the 2nd instance of bail-in language being implemented was discovered
in New Zealand, we correctly stated that a major policy shift had been
undertaken by the Western world’s central banksters, and that the use of
depositor funds to cover future bank losses and failures would occur
throughout the rest of the Eurozone and likely the US.
Even we never suspected however that Western Central banksters would be brazen enough to attempt to literally confiscate depositor funds in order to ensure their own salaries and bonuses.
If last week’s speech (& subsequently published by the BIS) given by the Governor of the Bank of Finland and Chairman of the High-level Expert Group on the structure of the EU banking sector is any indication, using depositor funds to guarantee their own salaries is exactly what Western banksters have in mind…
Even we never suspected however that Western Central banksters would be brazen enough to attempt to literally confiscate depositor funds in order to ensure their own salaries and bonuses.
If last week’s speech (& subsequently published by the BIS) given by the Governor of the Bank of Finland and Chairman of the High-level Expert Group on the structure of the EU banking sector is any indication, using depositor funds to guarantee their own salaries is exactly what Western banksters have in mind…
Excerpt from the BIS paper:
Bail-in lies at the core of tackling the “too-big-to-fail” problem as it improves the loss absorbency of banks, ensures that investors rather than taxpayers take on the responsibility for losses in the face of resolution, and further enhances creditors’ incentives to monitor banks. In the High-level Expert Group we foresaw a two tier system for the bailing in of investors in bank debt.




