Conspiracy Clown Predicts Your Future - The FKN Newz

"Your governments will become more right wing and fascist, more militaristic, less democratic, your rights will be marginalised, ignored, trampled on, circumvented by laws espousing security of some kind or another, hay, hay fucking hay!" Deek Jackson.

The Risks Of The War On Cash

By Don Quijones: On January 1st, Londoners woke up to a rather perplexing reality: all of the cashless Oyster card readers on the city’s buses, rail and tube stations had stopped working. With cash as good as banished from the London transport system, attendants had little choice but to wave passengers through open ticket barriers and onto buses without paying, until the problem was fixed.

Serious Pause for Thought

Ironically, the costly glitch came on a day that new fare increases were to be introduced, with journey prices going up by an average of 1%. According to research by the UK Labour Party, rail fares have risen at three times the rate of wages since 2010, with campaigners saying ticket prices have become “increasingly divorced from reality.”
While for London’s commuters the glitch offered a welcome respite from ever-spiraling transport costs, the temporary collapse of the Osyter Card system should give serious pause for thought about our growing dependence on electronic cashless payment systems, especially as government, central banks, financial institutions, credit card companies, and large corporations conspire openly to pull the plug on cash [read: The War on Cash in 10 Spine-Chilling Quotes].

Soon Robots Will Have More Rights Than Humans

Op-Ed by Jake Anderson(ANTIMEDIA): First, let me define my terms. When I use the word ‘robot,’ I am not referring only to automated machines or cybernetic androids. For the purposes of this article, ‘robot’ will refer to any artificially created entity or interface that is endowed with a high level of sentience and intelligence. A great example of this in popular culture is the operating system Samantha from the Spike Jonze film, Her, though this character is better utilized as a lens through which to assess the emotional dimensions of artificial intelligence.
By invoking robots, I am primarily referring to artificial intelligence. To be sure, artificial intelligence already exists. It just doesn’t look like what science fiction prognosticators of previous decades originally envisioned. Anytime you type into the Google search bar and the field is auto-populated with suggestions, that is an example of algorithmic artificial intelligence. Anytime Siri responds to one of your absurdly facetious questions (or legitimate queries), you are witnessing an embryonic form of artificial intelligence. We take it for granted, but these are extraordinary advances that would be have seemed impossible to previous generations.
In the future, the evolution of artificial intelligence will be so dramatic and rapid that we will scarcely be able to identify the point at which strong artificial intelligence surpasses human cognition, although some would argue that has already happened. Already, innovations like IBM’s Watson are surpassing the limits of human intelligence and, in the case of a computer program called Eugene Goostman, passing the Turing Test with flying colors.

Disturbing Jewish Narcissism

By Gilad Atzmon: In this uniquely disturbing video we witness some orthodox Jews filming themselves hopping in front of their phones cameras attesting how much they love and are proud of being themselves.

The US Men’s Rights Convention Of 1851

By Peter Wright: In 1851 the following article was penned by Chericot in Godey’s Lady’s Book, an American magazine for women published in Philadelphia. The article entitled Men’s Rights Convention was designed to mock proceedings of men’s rights conference held at Independence Hall. Did the conference really take place? My bet is that it did, and the article was an attempt to distort proceedings and dissuade MHRA’s from holding future conferences. – PW

MEN’S RIGHTS CONVENTION – SEPTEMBER 20th 1851

EXTRAORDINARY PROCEEDINGS, EXCITING SCENES, AND CURIOUS SPEECHES.
FROM OUR OWN REPORTER, CHERICOT.

Yesterday, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon, an immense mass meeting of gentlemen from all parts of the country was held at Independence Hall. It was convened upon notices to that effect, which were issued directly after the late extraordinary and treasonable Female Convention at Massachusetts, and which, being distributed among the principal cities in the Union, had resulted in the collection of an enthusiastic crowd of gentlemen of all grades, trades, and politics, one common danger uniting them, in the effort to repel the proposed feminine aggression of their rights.

Women’s And Men’s Rights

By Peter Wright: The following short article, entitled Women’s and Men’s Rights, appeared in the 1875 volume Historic and literary miscellany, by G.M.D. Bloss. – PW 

* * *

THERE have recently been Women’s Rights conventions in New York and Boston. The general drift of the proceedings was to show the wrongs of woman under the laws of society at present constituted. There were plenty of facts to show that in many instances women, at the present time, were ill-fed, ill-clothed, and ill-sheltered ; that their employment was not remunerative in many cases, and that under their afflictions they were driven often to live a life of vice and crime.
All this will be freely admitted and universally regretted. But, and the question may be asked with emphasis, are these wrongs peculiar to women? Do they alone suffer them? Is there a discrimination against the sex? We unhesitatingly answer in the negative. Would man–yea, would man, who is endowed with that wonderful right of suffrage, which in the eyes of these reformers is the great cure for all the grievances of the sex, not be enabled to find as serious cause of complaint as those made by his female associate?

One Lump Or Two Bitch - The Anti-Femenist Ragening

We got a surprising amount of tangential material from such a short dumb feminist video 'Tea Consent'. Once again, if you find it a little too tangential, you have my commiserations. But not my apologies.

'Fewer Than 1 Million Jews Killed In Holo-Hoax,' Says NY Ultra-Orthodox Rabbi

By Gilad Atzmon: Haaretz reported today that New York Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi confirmed earlier this week that only about 1 million Jews perished in the Holocaust. But don’t be shocked, the rabbi, a teacher at a yeshiva in Monsey, is not exactly a history revisionist. He is merely a quotidian Jewish supremacist. 

In a video on his YouTube channel, Rabbi Mizrachi cites high assimilation rates in Europe before World War II as support for his claim that 80% of those identified as Jews killed by the German National Socialists during the Holocaust were not Jewish according to Jewish law.
 “If you look at the percent of assimilation that there was in Europe, which already reached 80 percent, it’s reasonable to assume that 80 percent of the 6 million were not Jews,” said Mizrachi.
 It does follow that if the Rabbi is correct and out of the '6 million Jews’ who perished in the Holocaust, 5 million of them were actually Goyim, then the Jewish State and other Jewish institutions worldwide
must immediately return 80% of the reparation money to Germany and other European countries.

Universities And Freedom Of Speech

By Baroness Deech: Many Members of this House will have been students when there were troubles of one sort or another, depending on the age. Indeed, we may have cut our teeth on some of them. There were protects, sometimes violent, in the past, but never have those protests been so widely or indiscriminately launched and never have the university authorities been so complicit in allowing the free exchange of ideas to be closed down. Nor, in my experience, have students ever been so self-censorious. They claim a right not to be offended, but we cannot secure freedom of expression if we all also maintain a right not to be offended. That closes down the freedom of speech of others and, as explained by my noble friend Lady O’Neill in a recent Theos lecture, “offence” is subjective. Only that which is unlawful should be banned.

Free speech is under attack because of a widespread culture of victimisation and grievance. People are fearful of the consequences if they express unpopular views and so they stay silent. Academic freedom and freedom of speech are the poorer for it. There is a pincer movement between students blocking speech they disapprove of and the operation of the many laws imposed on universities to promote and control speech, which I will explain.
Universities have a unique responsibility to promote and secure free speech, not only for the advancement of public knowledge but for the training of our future leaders and professionals. Universities are bound by statute to give external speakers a platform, provided that they are speaking within the law. Extreme but lawful views should not be repressed but challenged. But extremist speakers are not being challenged because the students themselves are silencing the challengers.

Why Won't Women/Feminists Leave Male Hobbies Alone?

Why aren't men allowed male-only spaces? Why must women/Feminists seek to shape male-dominated past-times to fit their wants? They just can't leave us alone, can they? RobotThorium

Gershom Schocken* On Jewish Exclusivism And Intermarriage

Introduction by Gilad Atzmon: In this superb Haaretz' article from 1985, the paper's legendary editor Gershom Schocken explores the history of Jewish exclusivism and racial supremacy. Haaretz republished this excellent article two days ago following the Israeli Education Ministry's decision to ban a book about an Arab-Jewish love affair.
I believe  that the message is clear as much as it is obvious. Rather than assimilating into the region, the Jewish Sate has subscribed to the most radical form of Judaic segregation and choseness.
The Jewish Ban on Intermarriage Has Become a Curse
By Gershom Schocken: The main reason the rabbis oppose encounters between Jewish and Arab youths is that such meetings might lead to intermarriage. Even give the small chance that this would be the result of such interactions, there's no denying that the rabbis have touched on a most sensitive issues for Jews and Arabs living together in this land.
Ezra the Scribe is the person who banned intermarriage between the Jews who had returned from Babylon to the Land of Israel and the other nations already living here.

Feminist Rants - On The News - There May Be Hope! + MGTOW Gold Mine - Dumb, Drunk, Sluts & Abortions

I reference a couple of young Feminists complaining about the news; for all the wrong reasons, of course, but at least it is a start. There may be some hope for these women gentlemen; but not likely. M