What Does Feminism Mean?

Sargon of Akkad: It means that feminism needs new dragons to slay, constantly.

Dr. Kamrul Hasan Of London, “Known Genital Mutilator” Admits MGM Is Cultural, Not Medical

By Gary Costanza: Dr. Kamrul Hasan has been placed on the “Known Genital Mutilators” directory at neonatalcutting.org.
From his website circumcision-clinic.com:
“Welcome to the London Circumcision Clinic
We are a London based circumcision clinic located in Leytonstone. Our qualified surgeons carry out circumcisions on all age groups of males, including cosmetic circumcisions for adult males.
We employ numerous methods to ensure the correct procedure is used and also that it is carried out in a safe and sterile environment. Our patient confidentiality is of the strictest practise and confidentiality is assured to the highest level.
Our “After-Care” service provides you that peace of mind, especially when young children are involved. Our surgeons are available through out the year and can do home visits at your request.”
The Plastibell device shown above is one tool used by Dr. Hasan to circumcise infant boys. As you can see there are six sizes, and crucial to minimize bleeding and complications the right size must be used. What if his size is in between those choices? What if he’s bigger or smaller than the biggest or the smallest? That’s what happened to Jayvas Carson, a baby boy who was circumcised with the wrong size Plastibell, had massive bleeding, and ultimately died.

US Public Reaches Breaking Point With TSA

"Obama the baby bomber will pay respects, 

but not apologise for the US nuking of Japan."

World Economy Manias

Max and Stacy discuss the world economy going from mania to mania hoping it all pays off, as it did for fantasy and sci-fi writer, Ray Bradbury. In the second half Max continues his interview with Professor Steve Keen on Donald Trump’s debt plans and the UK’s shrinking manufacturing.

Watch Ron Paul Destroy The Two-Party System

“I’ve never bought into this idea that the lesser of two evils is a good idea.” — Ron Paul

May 15, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "Antimedia" -  Longtime congressman and former presidential candidate Ron Paul made it clear in a recent interview on CNN that he will vote 3rd party if the presidential race comes down to Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton.
Though Paul didn’t specify which candidate he would vote for, he did say Libertarian or Independent party candidates are a possibility. Paul also said he couldn’t support Ted Cruz, who has since dropped out of the race, because he’s a “theocrat” who wants to rule with religion. Paul didn’t comment on his specific reasons for not supporting Clinton, but one can speculate the fiercely anti-war Paul opposes her militaristic tendencies.

Then Paul went even further, saying both the Republican and Democratic parties — from Reagan to Obama — are controlled by the “Deep State” and powerful special interests.

- See more at: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44661.htm#sthash.gHfCSjfZ.dpuf

“I’ve never bought into this idea that the lesser of two evils is a good idea.” Said Ron Paul. 

Antimedia: Longtime congressman and former presidential candidate Ron Paul made it clear in a recent interview on CNN that he will vote 3rd party if the presidential race comes down to Donald Trump versus Hillary Clinton. - Then Paul went even further, saying both the Republican and Democratic parties — from Reagan to Obama — are controlled by the “Deep State” and powerful special interests.

US Backed Rebels Ahrar Al Sham Massacre Civilians In Zara

Syrian Girl: Just as the US and UK vetoed a Russian call to put Ahrar Al Sham on a terror list, this Rebel group ethnically cleansed allawites in the town of Al Zara in Homs province.

Bristol SU Save The Male Discussion - Absolute Joke

The idea it was hosted by a panel of experts is laughable – experts don’t start every point or sentence with “I think”, “I feel” or “I believe”. It’s almost as if the panel had done no research whatsoever.

By Jordan Holbrook:  Lo and behold, would you believe that yet another student panel on a topical men’s issue would be derailed by feminist virtue-signalling and man-blaming? It’s almost as if this sort of thing never happens! Yet, I am afraid to report, it happened at the Bristol SU “debate” titled Save the Male, as part of their Mind Your Head month that was held at the University of Bristol on Wednesday 4^th March.
The panel featured Natalie Jester, PhD candidate at University of Bristol; Ben Marshall, 4^th year Engineering student and another fellow who only said his name once, alas I could not find him on the Facebook event page. In fact, according to posts on said Facebook event page, there was supposed to be another speaker yet it wasn’t until the event when we were informed that this speaker had dropped out. Such an organised panel of field tested experts, I see.
The discussion started with the trailer video from The Representation Project “The Mask You Live In”, a terrible depiction of the issue of male suffering which essentially says that men are defective women (that tired argument) because they can’t be like women and talk about their feelings. It features young boys talking about their issues and the trailer states that because they are masculine is why they are suffering.

Golders Green Anti-Male Infant Ritual Genital Mutilation [AKA Circumcision] Protest 12-05-16

Needless to say we weren’t entirely welcome

By Jordan Holbrook: The protest, organised by Mike Buchanan, leader of the political party Justice For Men & Boys, started at 1300 sharp and by the time I arrived several were already present, setting up banners and talking with the local police – they had arrived to oversee the demonstration. It was a hot day, certainly perfect weather for a protest, people will be out and about, living their lives and hearing what we have to say. We were collecting outside the Temple Fortune Clinic, this location had been chosen because Dr Martin Harris, a known genital mutilator, worked here. We were hoping to see him.

We were generally met with positive reception, although inevitably there were those who came and argued. A man claiming to be a doctor came out to inform us how we were wrong and did not know anything. Alas he was not Doctor

Martin Harris, the man we had come to see. He, despite giving no credentials nor any evidence himself, argued with a pretentious certainty that what he was saying was correct and what we were saying was not. “Circumcision has no lasting, negative effects”. I’m sorry sir, but there were several men, in fact several circumcised men, who were present that would very much beg to differ.

ROSES

RHYMESKEEMZ
GlobalFaction

AMERIKAN GOOGL + PLANET X - WB7

Why Aren’t Hiroshima And Nagasaki War Crimes?

By Jacob G. Hornberger: I don’t get it. On the one hand, we’re told that the intentional targeting of civilians in wartime is a war crime. On the other hand, we’re told that the intentional targeting of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nuclear bombs was not a war crime.

Which is it?

The issue is back in the news with President Obama’s decision to visit Hiroshima. The question that is being debated is whether he should apologize for President Truman’s decision to order U.S. troops to drop nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II.

If the targeting of civilians in wartime is okay, then clearly the decision to nuke the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not a war crime.

But if that’s the case, then why was U.S. Army Lt. William Calley prosecuted during the Vietnam War? He’s the officer who intentionally killed several defenseless women and children in a Vietnamese village. The military prosecuted and convicted him of a war crime. Why? If it’s not a war crime to intentionally kill women and children in wartime, then why was Calley prosecuted and convicted of war crimes?

The Demoralized Mind

Western consumer culture is creating a psycho-spiritual crisis that leaves us disoriented and bereft of purpose. How can we treat our sick culture and make ourselves well? 

By John F Schumaker: Our descent into the Age of Depression seems unstoppable. Three decades ago, the average age for the first onset of depression was 30. Today it is 14. Researchers such as Stephen Izard at Duke University point out that the rate of depression in Western industrialized societies is doubling with each successive generational cohort. At this pace, over 50 per cent of our younger generation, aged 18-29, will succumb to it by middle age. Extrapolating one generation further, we arrive at the dire conclusion that virtually everyone will fall prey to depression.
By contrast to many traditional cultures that lack depression entirely, or even a word for it, Western consumer culture is certainly depression-prone. But depression is so much a part of our vocabulary that the word itself has come to describe mental states that should be understood differently. In fact, when people with a diagnosis of depression are examined more closely, the majority do not actually fit that diagnosis. In the largest study of its kind, Ramin Mojtabai of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health sampled over 5,600 cases and found that only 38 per cent of them met the criteria for depression.