Regards, 🐻
7 Jul 2018
Another Father Died To Save His Children
Via MIKE BUCHANAN, J4MB: A piece in today’s Times:
A Canadian man died protecting his children from a polar bear that attacked the family on the shore of a small island on the western edge of Hudson Bay.
Aaron Gibbons and his children were on Century Island, a strip of land six miles from the mainland hamlet of Arviat, where locals go to fish and hunt.
“He was enjoying a day with his children,” Mr Gibbons’s uncle, Gordon Kidlapid, said. The children are believed to be of primary school age. “They were surprised by a bear that had started to stalk or charge toward one of his children.”
Polar bears are regularly seen on the island and Mr Gibbons, 31, was thought to have taken a rifle with him on Wednesday. However, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police said he did not have the gun to hand when the bear attacked, and he faced it unarmed.
“He told his children to run to the boat while he was putting himself between the bear and his children to protect them,”
How The United Kingdom Became A Police State
Authored by Neema Parvini: This article will demonstrate how the United Kingdom has steadily become a police state over the past twenty years, weaponizing its institutions against the people and employing Orwellian techniques to stop the public from seeing the truth. It will demonstrate, contrary to official narratives, that both overall levels of crime and violent crime have been increasing, not decreasing, as the size of the state in the UK has gotten bigger. It will also expose how the Labour government under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown from 1997 to 2010, deliberately obscured real crime data with estimated crime rates based on survey data as opposed to the real numbers. I will demonstrate that, contrary to popular opinion perpetuated by progressive myths, life was much safer in Britain during the era of classical laissez-faire from the 1850s to 1911.In his 10 years in power from 1997 to 2007, Tony Blair passed an astonishing 26,849 laws in total, an average of 2,663 per year or 7.5 a day. The Labour Party continued this madness under Gordon Brown who broke the record in 2008 by passing 2,823 new laws, a 6% increase on even his megalomaniac predecessor. In 2010, Labour’s last year in power before handing over the reigns to the Blairite social radical, David Cameron, there was a 54% surge in privacy cases brought against public bodies, and the Cabinet were refusing freedom of information requests at a rate of 51%. The vast number of new laws under Labour does not count the 2,100 new regulations the EU passed in 2006 alone, which apparently is average for them.
What’s The Problem With Men Supporting Jordan Peterson?
'We are women who are coming to understand our capacity for both good and evil, who are ready to take responsibility for our lives, and who don’t feel threatened by empowered men.'
By Mila Davis: Dr. Jordan Peterson, bestselling author of 12 Rules for Life, University of Toronto psychology professor, and influential public speaker, has taken the media by storm. To the dismay of feminists and the radical left, the number of his supporters keeps skyrocketing. Both, men and women like Peterson, but you would never guess from reading most articles about him. Whether it’s The New York Times, The Chronicle, or The Guardian, they all make sure to highlight the maleness of Peterson’s followers.
It’s not just that an objective observation about the genitalia of his supporters is being made, however. The media just can’t stop rubbing, scratching, and clawing. It’s as if the aforementioned genitalia are infested with crabs. In the now infamous Channel 4 News interview, journalist Cathy Newman asked Peterson, “Does it bother you that your audience is predominately male?” While at first this question may not appear unusual or even critical, it certainly is. Has anyone ever asked Oprah a similar question about her female audience? Of course not.
6 Jul 2018
Bearing And The Senator
Abolish The Fed's Money Monopoly: Legalize Competition
Guardian Gleefully Reports Baseless Sexual Assault Allegations Against Conservative Aide Then Buries The Story When He Is Cleared
hequal: On Tuesday Conservative aide Richard Holden wrote a must-read article about his experience of being falsely accused of sexual assault. His ordeal saw Holden resign from his job and then losing another only to be cleared in less than an hour by a jury with even the judge noting his innocence and the fiasco appears to be yet another case of serious misconduct by the police and CPS.
The allegations against Holden [right] were first reported by Buzzfeed on November 7th 2017, with two of their journalists writing an article with 14 paragraphs about the allegations. Buzzfeed doesn’t appear to have covered the trial itself while it was in progress, but reported the verdict, albeit about as concisely as possible. The article is just five sentences long, and only three of those concern the case itself, with no detail whatsoever about the judge’s comments nor the speed in which Holden was cleared.
In such cases, it’s interesting to examine media coverage of events, and examine contrasts between reporting of mere allegations put forward during the trial, and the actual verdict.
It’s obvious that Buzzfeed has no interest in the countless victims of false accusations in the UK and their coverage of the Holden case reflects this. However, while their behaviour is unpleasant and extremely poor journalism, it isn’t grossly unethical either and they have at least produced a headline making readers aware of Holden’s innocence (if not the true reality of the situation).
5 Jul 2018
A Man Takes A Stand
By Mark Dent: I have a new hero. His name is David Leyonhjelm and he is a senator in our federal parliament. Last week he caused a furore here in Australia when he told a rabid feminist senator Sarah Hanson Young to “stop shagging men.” When she confronted him with confected outrage he simply told her to “fuck off.”Why did he say it?
I have already written about the rape and murder of a young woman in Melbourne a few weeks ago. The issue of protection for women was being discussed in the Senate. Let Mr. Leyonhjelm explain what happened in his own words.
“She called out something that I’m 99% sure was ‘If only men would stop raping women,’ so she was saying that in the context of why they need something for self defense (mace was suggested), the inference being that men are collectively responsible for such attacks as happened in Melbourne. I responded by saying ‘Stop shagging men.’
“She was effectively saying ‘the enemy is men. ‘I was responding by saying, ‘you’re sleeping with the enemy’. What I was objecting to was the misandry, the blaming of men for the actions of individual criminals.”
What followed can only be imagined. The media melted and expressed outrage over this dinosaur..this uncouth relic from a dark, bygone era.
Genuine Trade War
SPLC Finally Getting Sued Over Their Lies
Honest Government Ad - Visit The Northern Territory!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)