"Whenever we see the BBC putting something out we have to we have to first of all assume it's not true, secondly we have to investigate it for ourselves and draw our own conclusions."
Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson, Debi Evans and Vanessa Beeley.
Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
"Whenever we see the BBC putting something out we have to we have to first of all assume it's not true, secondly we have to investigate it for ourselves and draw our own conclusions."
Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson, Debi Evans and Vanessa Beeley.
'The great thing about The Jews' apartheid regime Israel's politics is it is completely unhinged and unashamedly racist.'
By Omar Karmi: Naftali Bennett’s coalition government is entering the final furlong before inevitable and well-deserved oblivion.
The coalition is now a minority in the Israeli parliament after Ghaida Rinawie Zoabi, an MP for the Meretz Party, last week decided she could no longer continue in a government that “shamefully harasses the society I came from.”
Zoabi is a Palestinian citizen of Israel.
One could ask, what did she expect? This is a government led by a prime minister who bragged about having “killed lots of Arabs … and there’s no problem with that.”
But then, this unlikely coalition was never going to last long. It was predicated on a shared opposition to Likud Party leader Benjamin Netanyahu and little else.
By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: The New York Times has abandoned the neoconservative demand for victory over Russia:
“A decisive military victory for Ukraine over Russia, in which Ukraine regains all the territory Russia has seized since 2014, is not a realistic goal. … Russia remains too strong…”
“… Mr. Biden should also make clear to President Volodymyr Zelensky and his people that there is a limit to how far the United States and NATO will go to confront Russia, and limits to the arms, money and political support they can muster. It is imperative that the Ukrainian government’s decisions be based on a realistic assessment of its means and how much more destruction Ukraine can sustain.”
"Here's the punchline, there's not that much to worry about, but we do have to worry about the official reactions to it, it's been way overplayed."
NATO has raised the stakes by flooding Ukraine with heavy weaponry and trying to prolong the conflict, says Scott Ritter, a military analyst and former US Marine intelligence officer.
Sputnik: In a recent interviews with Sputnik you said that if Russia is “able to achieve some sort of demonstrable battlefield victory of such a large scale that the inevitable defeat of Ukraine is played before the European community, that would put a damper on the provision of weaponry [by the West] in a futile exercise.” Could the surrender of Ukrainian military, National Guard and neo-Nazis in Azovstal be considered this sort of victory?
Scott Ritter: It’s an impressive victory. It’s an important victory. It’s a strategic victory, but it’s not the victory over Western weaponry that I was speaking of. It was a static victory, achieved after driving defenders underground. That was the latter half of the battle. It wasn’t a battle against Ukrainian forces that had been trained and equipped, especially, with this new wave of military assistance. Now that battle is taking place. I think with what we’re seeing in Donbass we see the potential formation of several cauldrons that have the potential of surrounding many thousands of Ukrainian troops. That’s the victory I think that could turn the tide in terms of shaping or influencing opinion in Europe and elsewhere.
Russia and China have “common interests”. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said his country will focus on strengthening ties with China, saying the two neighboring countries have common interests and can make technological advances together.
According to RT, Lavrov made the remarks while speaking to students at a high school in Moscow.
Lavrov said Russia and China have “common interests” in international affairs and the two sides can reap the benefits of working closely on technology.
“This is an opportunity for us to realize our potential in the field of high technology, including nuclear energy, but also in a number of other areas,” Lavrov added.
'I’ve
seen some cute kids in my time, but nobody’s as adorable as people who
think the US pours weapons into foreign nations in order to achieve
peace.'
By Caitlin Johnstone: US Senator Joe Manchin said at the World Economic Forum on Monday that he opposes any kind of peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia.
Manchin, who at the moment is one of the most powerful elected officials in Washington, added that only the complete forcible ejection of Russia from all of Ukraine is acceptable, that the war should ideally be used to remove Putin from power, and that he and the strategists he talks to see this war as an “opportunity”.
“I am totally committed, as one person, to seeing Ukraine to the end with a win, not basically with some kind of a treaty; I don’t think that is where we are and where we should be,” Manchin said.
“I mean basically moving Putin back to Russia and hopefully getting rid of Putin,” Manchin added when asked what he meant by a win for Ukraine.
'Unfortunately, the Biden administration continues to make one glaring
error after another, and at some point our good fortune will run out.'
If there was ever a time to invoke the 25th Amendment, it is now. If
we start shooting at the Chinese and the Russians, the unthinkable will
actually become reality. There will be no “do overs”, and there will
be no going back to the way that life was before.
During a press conference in Japan, Biden was asked if he would use the U.S. military to defend Taiwan if China invades. This is how he responded…
'In UK processes, Violence Against femles avoids conflict
with the Equality Act 2010 because it is understood as a technical legal
expression denoting a category of crime which includes male victims of
said crimes. There is no such provision in regard to the Istanbul Convention.'
If no objections are raised to ratification of the Convention in either House within the next 21 joint sitting days, the Government will arrange to deposit its instrument of ratification. In line with the requirement under section 1(3)(b) of the 2017 Act I can therefore confirm that I would expect the UK to have ratified the Convention by 31 July 2022.
I have written to my MP asking him to raise an objection – text below. I am hardly optimistic, but it’s worth a shot.
Fewer and fewer judges believe that their
function is to uphold the Constitution based on history and precedent or
“original intent.”
By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: The 1896 Supreme Court Plessy decision, which gave us “separate but equal” is widely considered today to be incorrect. Legal scholars maintain that the private railroad company violated the Constitution by separating people in railway cars on the basis of race. Justice John Marshall Harlan’s dissent–“Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens”–is almost universally considered correct.
How can it be, then, that the same legal scholars who damn the Plessy decision support the 1896 Supreme Court’s Plessy reasoning when they uphold the right of private media to divide people into classes based on belief and to discriminate on the basis of opinion? TV, print, radio, and social media all discriminate against those who dissent from the official narratives. If the railway company’s policy was in violation of the 14th Amendment, most certainly media’s policy of censorship and “cancelling” is in violation of the 1st Amendment.
Law schools have never looked seriously at Justice Harlan’s famous claim that the Constitution “neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.” It most certainly does. The same railway company that provided different railway cars for different races provided different railway cars for different classes. People were, and still are today, segregated by economic class. A second class ticket is no good in a first class car.
RN: The meeting of the President of Russia Vladimir Putin and the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko took place in Sochi. The Presidents discussed issues of economic cooperation between Russia and Belarus. In addition, one of the main goals for the meeting was the topic of security for Russia and Belarus in connection with the conduct of Russia's special military operation in Ukraine. The Presidents are concerned about the advancement of NATO countries to the borders of Russia and Belarus, as well as in connection with the latest statements by Polish President Andrzej Duda, which he recently made in Kyiv.
'The harm done to the United States by the perfidy of the Clintonistas cannot be overemphasized.'
Authored by David Zukerman: The Wall Street Journal ran a scathing editorial on May 20, called "Hillary Clinton Did It".
This editorial began:
"The Russia-Trump collusion narrative of 2016 was a dirty trick for the ages -- and now we know it came from the top -- candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton."
The editorial quickly explained:
"That was the testimony Friday by 2016 Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook in federal court [in Washington, D.C.], and while this news is hardly a surprise, it's still bracing to find her fingertips on the political weapon."