Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
ALTERNATIVE NEWS
20 Sept 2015
'Sarkeesian Effect' Thunderf00t Interview
Join Us, Protesting Against Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) – Conservative Party Conference, Manchester, 4 October
By Mike Buchanan: In two weeks’ time we’ll [J4MB] be supporting Men Do Complain (MDC), a hardworking anti-MGM campaigning organization, at a protest outside the Manchester Central venue, at the start of the Conservative party conference. More on this later in the blog post.
Regular followers of the J4MB blog know our #1 campaigning issue for the foreseeable future will be the non-therapeutic genital mutilation of male minors (henceforth ‘MGM’). It was one of 20 areas covered in our election manifesto (pp.9,10). Anyone who doesn’t understand why we consider MGM a grave assault upon the human rights of men and boys might like to familiarise themselves with some or all of the following materials:
William Collins’s blog piece (which explains, among much else, that the prime purpose of MGM is to diminish men’s pleasure during sex)
A renowned psychology professor condemns MGM
Global Survey on Circumcision Harm
Regular followers of the J4MB blog know our #1 campaigning issue for the foreseeable future will be the non-therapeutic genital mutilation of male minors (henceforth ‘MGM’). It was one of 20 areas covered in our election manifesto (pp.9,10). Anyone who doesn’t understand why we consider MGM a grave assault upon the human rights of men and boys might like to familiarise themselves with some or all of the following materials:William Collins’s blog piece (which explains, among much else, that the prime purpose of MGM is to diminish men’s pleasure during sex)
A renowned psychology professor condemns MGM
Global Survey on Circumcision Harm
Why Does Speaking Out About The Issues Men Face Always Trigger A Furious Reaction?
After editing a book in which 40 writers talk about what it means to be a man today, Dan Bell is still shocked by the hostility faced by those who speak up about men's issues
By Dan Bell: A few days ago I was at a party in liberal north-east London, when I was asked the inevitable question, “So, what do you do then?”
It’s a question I have come to dread. This isn’t because I’m ashamed of my work, or because I think it’s dull and uninteresting, but because I know that if I tell the truth, the warm and open conversation I’d been having with the person in front of me will often suddenly be replaced by a chilled and awkward silence.
You see, telling people I write about men’s issues often feels a bit like telling them I work for Exxon.
On this occasion, I weighed up the conversational fork in the road ahead of me, and decided to take the plunge and be honest, so I told her I’d just finished editing a book of 40 writers exploring what it means to be a man in the UK today. Her response was simply: “That’s brave.”
MGTOW mENTERTAINMENT
Hirsh Vs. Corbyn
By Gilad Atzmon: In an open letter published in the Jewish Chronicle,
notorious hard core Zionist David Hirsh advises the opposition leader
what to do if he seeks ‘the trust of Jewish voters.’ As usual, Hirsh
has produced an obscure document that reveals little other than the
delusional level of Judeo-centrism symptomatic of Hirsh and his ilk.
Hirsh
lists Corbyn’s ‘crimes:’ “You worked for Press TV, the Iranian regime's
propaganda channel and you recommend Russia Today, Putin's version. You
appear in cosy pictures with Hugo Chavez, with Hamas, with Gerry Adams
(days after the Brighton bombing) and with Hezbollah. You said that Nato
is the aggressor in Ukraine and that Daesh is no worse than the USA.
You were the national chair of Stop the War even when it appeared to
endorse the killing of British soldiers. You celebrated the anniversary
of the Iranian revolution.”
Yet, despite this roster, Corbyn won the Labour leadership in a landslide victory that left the Blairites and the usual Sabbos Goyim far behind, isolated and humiliated. How did this happen? Simple, for the vast majority of Labour members, Corbyn’s ‘crimes’ were not a problem, quite the opposite. Labour party members made Corbyn their leader because they agree with the rationale behind his arguments and affiliations. They chose Corbyn as their leader because they are not happy with the Jewish Lobby hijacking their country’s politics.
Hirsh
lists Corbyn’s ‘crimes:’ “You worked for Press TV, the Iranian regime's
propaganda channel and you recommend Russia Today, Putin's version. You
appear in cosy pictures with Hugo Chavez, with Hamas, with Gerry Adams
(days after the Brighton bombing) and with Hezbollah. You said that Nato
is the aggressor in Ukraine and that Daesh is no worse than the USA.
You were the national chair of Stop the War even when it appeared to
endorse the killing of British soldiers. You celebrated the anniversary
of the Iranian revolution.”Yet, despite this roster, Corbyn won the Labour leadership in a landslide victory that left the Blairites and the usual Sabbos Goyim far behind, isolated and humiliated. How did this happen? Simple, for the vast majority of Labour members, Corbyn’s ‘crimes’ were not a problem, quite the opposite. Labour party members made Corbyn their leader because they agree with the rationale behind his arguments and affiliations. They chose Corbyn as their leader because they are not happy with the Jewish Lobby hijacking their country’s politics.
UK Privatisation Schemes As Sovereign Reassignment Operations
19 Sept 2015
BBC Comedy RIP
By Mike Buchanan: I’ve long been a comedy buff, and I’m perfectly happy to concede the BBC has been the source of some priceless comedy series over my lifetime – Fawlty Towers being a particular favourite.
The quality of BBC comedy series has long been in decline, possibly because material has to gain the approval of the BBC’s political correctness brigade, a reliable way to strangle genuinely funny comedy ideas at birth. Hope springs eternal, however, and I’ve just watched People Time on BBC3. In my TV guide, the programme was described thus:
The comedic premise of the sketch was that if men oppose feminists their male friends will desert them, and they will then have to grovel to feminists for acceptance.
The quality of BBC comedy series has long been in decline, possibly because material has to gain the approval of the BBC’s political correctness brigade, a reliable way to strangle genuinely funny comedy ideas at birth. Hope springs eternal, however, and I’ve just watched People Time on BBC3. In my TV guide, the programme was described thus:
Lively comedy show pilot starring seven comedy rising stars (including Claudia O’Doherty and Ellie White). The skits cover a range of modern issues, big and small, from online dating and workplace sexism to mobile phones and junk mail – the shouty man in the street manages to be both silly and subversive.Sounds like a riot, right? Er, no. I didn’t laugh once, and came close to smiling on only one occasion. The lowest point in this dismal waste of licence payers’ money was the aforementioned ‘shouty man in the street’ encountering three ‘No More Page 3’ campaigners on the street, 11:49 – 12:47.
The comedic premise of the sketch was that if men oppose feminists their male friends will desert them, and they will then have to grovel to feminists for acceptance.
The Case Of Zach Jesse - Can Men’s Rights Help Women Too?
By Hank Miller: Commonly, people are told that organizations that advocate for men’s rights are unnecessary because feminism, when done right, is pro-man as well as being pro-women. Since feminists are also looking out for men and advancing men’s issues, we are told, men should rally behind these organizations and let women take charge of making the world a better place for men.
The fact that this claim is demonstrably false is likely no surprise to most readers of this site. When men and boys are consistently lagging further and further behind in education, systematically denied due process rights when accused of crimes, and disproportionately targeted by policies that punish boys for being boys, the claim that feminism is helping men rings hollow indeed.
What is less obvious, though much more interesting, is that the claim may be the exact inverse of the truth. In short, it may be the case that, in certain instances, advancing the cause of men’s rights is the way to advance the cause of women as well.
Consider the recent case of Zach Jesse. To the best of my knowledge this case received very little publicity, but it perfectly illustrates the problems with the present spat of rape hysteria that has been inflicted on Americans.
What is less obvious, though much more interesting, is that the claim may be the exact inverse of the truth. In short, it may be the case that, in certain instances, advancing the cause of men’s rights is the way to advance the cause of women as well.
Consider the recent case of Zach Jesse. To the best of my knowledge this case received very little publicity, but it perfectly illustrates the problems with the present spat of rape hysteria that has been inflicted on Americans.
Reddit Feminists Talk About Gynocentrism
By Peter Wright: The following Reddit discussion of the concept “gynocentrism” is one of the first to appear on social media among feminists. Seems they have figured out that the Men’s Human Rights community have a coherent psychosocial theory under the heading gynocentrism, and that the growing reach of the term has become unavoidable. Feminists discuss its implications and, as you will see from the Reddit comments, some are getting with it, and some are rejecting it.
There was a comment in this thread that I found very interesting. It was in response to the question “what do MRAs attribute men’s problems to?” It didn’t receive any replies and I can’t find a discussion specifically on the topic (although it does crop up here and there), so I’m highlighting it for comments here.
There was a comment in this thread that I found very interesting. It was in response to the question “what do MRAs attribute men’s problems to?” It didn’t receive any replies and I can’t find a discussion specifically on the topic (although it does crop up here and there), so I’m highlighting it for comments here.
The more sophisticated among [the MRM] operate with a curious concept called “gynocentrism”. Essentially, they view feminism as ONE of the possible manifestations of “gynocentrism” (intended largely as society’s alleged prioritization of women over men, as an anthropological universal rooted in evo-psych) – and patriarchal societies as other possible manifestations of the same core phenomenon.
Psychopaths Rule Us
"Wreck the world the better to control it!" Lew Rockwell
"These are cowards freaks liers and fools and they are destroying our [US] nation. They are sociopaths and psycopaths, they are sick SOBs and nobody wants to call them what they are!" Gerald Celente
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



