You now need the government’s permission to listen to content on Spotify...
Authored by Steve Watson: 
The legislation was presented as an effort to protect children from seeing things they shouldn’t be seeing online.
However, to absolutely no one’s surprise, it’s already being used to eviscerate free speech.
The first thing that was blocked were videos of protests outside hotels where the government is housing illegal immigrants on the taxpayer’s dime.
British users of X shared screenshots of messages that popped up while they attempted to view footage from the protests, which started in Epping after a migrant sexually assaulted a teenage girl and have since spread around the country.
The Telegraph report states:But they won’t stop burglars and thieves. Backwards. pic.twitter.com/Bas7F4MXb7
— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) July 27, 2025
An elite team of police officers is to monitor social media for anti-migrant sentiment amid fears of summer riots.
Detectives will be drawn from forces across the country to take part in a new investigations unit that will flag up early signs of potential civil unrest.
The division, assembled by the Home Office, will aim to “maximise social media intelligence” gathering after police forces were criticised over their response to last year’s riots.
Probably purely a coincidence, right?
Also probably purely a coincidence that a shady government outfit now known as the National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT) has been lobbying social media companies to take action against users who post what it describes as “concerning narratives” about immigration and ‘two tier policing’.
Previously known as the ‘Counter Disinformation Unit’, it was formerly tasked with identifying and monitoring COVID lockdown dissenters during the pandemic.
While censoring dissenting voices is evidently a primary focus for elements within the British Deep State, a whole host of other stuff has been blocked.A Whitehall “disinformation” unit used tools created to hunt for jihadists to find critics of asylum hotels, The Telegraph can reveal
— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) August 3, 2025
Read the full piece by Tony Diver here⤵️https://t.co/25vJWuJdWA pic.twitter.com/QrCcVGZqwY
Whether this is intentional and nefarious or just a result of the massively broad terms of what the government could possibly consider ‘harmful’ or ‘hateful’ content, or whether the social media companies just don’t know, or just don’t want to take any chances, remains to be determined.
X user Chris Middleton shared an enraging thread of some of the stuff Brits can’t see anymore.
The Online Safety Act has been in force for one week, and it’s already censoring rape victims, protest footage, and even lactose intolerance.
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
Starmer says it’s about protecting children. In reality, it’s stifling free speech.
Here's what's been censored so far🧵 pic.twitter.com/v3jv4l3Lvf
Yes, can’t talk about that. We all know why.A rape gang survivor’s testimony? Blocked.
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
Sammy Woodhouse (@officialsammyuk) says “the UK’s Online Safety Act—put in place by our government—has done nothing but silence the victims.”
How does silencing survivors “protect” anyone?https://t.co/7orgbBQ8x2
Can you even see that post? Probably not if you’re in the UK. And as already mentioned…Every day with this. But you're a fascist if you protest it. https://t.co/q9ci4kqT6W
— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) August 3, 2025
A witty X account exposing how awful Britain has become, also blocked.Protests against the government outside migrant hotels? Censored.@MorgothsReview reports footage of dissent being blocked.
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
Blocking videos of people protesting the government under legislation called the “Online Safety Act” is truly Orwellian.https://t.co/y0fzFq4Gum
A whole host of other innocuous things…It gets more absurd. @kunley_drukpa says @MythoYookay, an account that ironically enough, satirises the UK’s decline, is also being censored.
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
When even satire is being restricted in the UK, things have clearly gone too far.https://t.co/nv1PZ2CiMT
Spotify…You cant listen to music now without the government’s permission.But it doesn’t stop there.
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
According to @cremieuxrecueil, their content on lactose intolerance, donkeys, and Neanderthals has been blocked.
This is what happens when MPs who can’t open a PDF start regulating global tech.https://t.co/uMQMS5kqWo
Absolutely insane, and we’re only one week into this.It’s not just X. Reddit is also blocking content far beyond the scope of pornography.@freddienew reports that users cannot view the r/beer subreddit without submitting their ID.https://t.co/WIM52mByYr
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
A petition to repeal the censorship has almost half a million signatures at time of writing.The Online Safety Act is clearly not just about protecting children.
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
It is a poorly worded law, written by people who don't understand the internet.
Oh, and if you disagree with it, Labour says you’re “on the side of predators”.https://t.co/BnkmipDWDv
SourceOver 467,300 signatures for repeal. https://t.co/EJ9BRbZ4f4
— Kathleen Tyson (@Kathleen_Tyson_) August 1, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment