Music Souljahs

Mc Webber (Beijing)
feat. Jackson Turner (New York)
& Apex Zero (London)

UK Families Devastated By False FGM Claims ~ Meanwhile Boys Genitally Mutilated MGM With Impunity, Because Jews

Via Stu, J4MB: This. A few key facts about genital mutilation:

• both FGM and MGM are illegal in the UK, under the Offences Against the Person Act (1861). FGM is also specifically illegal under a 1985 Act, introduced at the behest of feminists who had no interest in MGM coming to an end
• MGM is carried out by men at the behest of men
• FGM is carried out by women at the behest of women
• all MGM is more injurious than most FGM
• MGM is common in the UK, especially in Muslim and Jewish families
• FGM is rarely carried out in the UK, and the police / CPS do not target the cohort of women carrying it out, middle-aged and elderly black women, so determined are they to perpetuate the lying feminist narrative (the word ‘lying’ is superfluous, of course) that FGM is carried out at the behest of men. In Africa in particular, women oppose initiatives to end FGM, while men support the initiatives

Dear Russia: An Enemy Is Not A Partner

By Paul Craig Roberts: Russians are concerned about Washington’s arbitrary closing of their San Francisco consulate and the illegal searching of diplomatic properties. There is no question that Washington has violated diplomatic protections and international law.
Why did Washington show its outlaw face to the world?
Was it to show that as strong as Russia is, Russia cannot protect herself from Washington? No international law, no diplomatic immunity can stand in Washington’s way. Washington can violate all law with no consequence.
Washington’s view is that might, and only might, makes right. Law is thrown out of the window, so why does Russia rely on law in her dealings with Washington?
Was it to plant some fake evidence in the Russian properties of Russian complicity in the US presidential election that elected a candidate that prefered peace over conflict with Russia?
Russia’s foreign minister Lavrov has told the US Secretary of State that Russia is going to sue over the seizure and search of Russia’s diplomatic properties. So, here we see again the Russians trying to deal with Washington through law, courts, diplomacy, whatever, and not facing the real issue.
What is the real issue?
The Real Issue is that the US military/security complex, the most powerful component of the US government, has decided that Russia is the ENEMY that justifies its $1,000 billion annual budget and the power that goes with it.

Burbling Shash

"The lie in question is, you're a Nazi!"

Burbling Shash: Coffee is the key to high energy. And high energy is the key to engineering. And engineering is the key to whatever keyhole you engineered.

Living In A Woman's World - Parts 1 - 5 + Men Scammed

MGTOW 101
"By the age of 80 there are nearly twice as many women alive as men."

Is US Really A 3% GDP Economy?

Max and Stacy discuss ‘the mysterious' moves in gold markets moments before Janet Yellen spoke in Jackson Hole, Wyoming and the equally mysterious, unknowable event that happened in the mid-seventies to cause wages to decline as productivity continued to climb. In the second half, Max interviews Mish Shedlock of MishTalk.com about the latest in US financial markets and data: Is it really a 3% GDP economy?

The Arab American Radicals Who Paved Way For BDS Against Genocidal Apartheid Jewish State

"Shared outrage over the dispossession of Palestinian Arabs through the establishment of the state of Israel.”

By Rod Such: The Rise of the Arab American Left: Activists, Allies, and Their Fight against Imperialism and Racism, 1960s-1980s by Pamela E. Pennock, The University of North Carolina Press (2017)

One of the earliest boycott, divestment and sanctions, or BDS, victories in the United States came in 1973 when United Auto Workers Local 600 in Dearborn, Michigan, voted to divest its Israeli bonds after a campaign waged by the Arab Workers Caucus and the American Arab Coordinating Committee. The campaign drew comparisons with apartheid South Africa and won the support of many Black autoworkers in Michigan.
Was it just an oddity that decades before Palestinian civil society called for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel in 2005, industrial workers in the US heartland were already waging a BDS struggle? Or, far from being a rogue wave, was it an integral part of the oceanic upheavals among workers, students, immigrants and people of color during the heady maelstroms of the 1960s and ’70s?

Why Aren’t We Discussing The Things We Agree On?

By Michael Krieger: The political environment since Trump’s election seems to get worse and worse by the day, as much of the American public becomes increasingly divided, embittered and downright insane. People across the political spectrum are enthusiastically fueling this destructive behavior in their varied quests to show how right they are and how hopelessly wrong everyone else is. Meanwhile, those who truly wield power in our society continue to laugh all the way to the bank.
Earlier today, I came across a prescient and powerful article written by Pamela B. Paresky in Psychology Today titled, Angry About the Election?
Although the piece was composed only a few weeks after the 2016 election, the writing was already on the wall and she identified and warned about the dangerous direction we were headed in. Here are a few choice excerpts: 
Peruse any Facebook page and you’re sure to find plenty of anger and disgust there, too. Some Clinton supporters are “unfriending” Trump voters. Others proclaim they are no longer speaking to friends who voted for Trump. It’s not uncommon for people to explicitly state that they have no desire or intention to “come together” with nor even “have compassion” for anyone who voted for Trump.

Circumcision Regret Dad & Intactivist Daughter

Bonobo3D: Jonathon Hernandez and his daughter Haylee discuss their activism for the human right to body integrity at the AAP Conference in San Francisco.

Being A Kept Man Is Bad For Your Health, New Study Reveals

By Henry Bodkin: It turns out having a wife who is the main breadwinner is potentially dangerous for a husband's health.
Researchers found being a kept man, with a wife who is the primary earner, increases the chances of heart disease, strokes and type two diabetes.
Sociologists at Rutgers University in the US who carried out the study said the problems arise when the husband loses his role as chief earner.
Being superseded by a spouse in the income stakes seems to strike a heavy blow to men's health.
It's thought men suffer psychologically from being toppled from their position as main provider and that this has a knock-on effect on physical health.
The Rutgers team studied nearly 2,000 couples over 30 years, monitoring changes in earnings and status.
They found much higher rates of stress-related illness as well as heart problems and diabetes in men financially overtaken by their wives.

The harmful effects on husbands persisted irrespective of social class, suggesting low-income earners suffer just as much as those on mega salaries.
In a report on the findings researchers said: 'Wives increasingly out-earn their husbands and this may undermine men's well-being.

Sexual Consent Courses Should Teach ‘Don’t Get Raped’ As Well As ‘Don’t Rape’

Bettina Arndt: Sexual consent courses should teach ‘don’t get raped’ as well as ‘don’t rape’.

Deterrence Believers Shoud Cheer The North Korean Bomb

By Craig Murray: If the theory of nuclear deterrence holds true – and it is the only argument the supporters of WMD have got – then we should all be cheering the North Korean bomb. The logic of nuclear deterrence is that it is much better that every state has nuclear weapons, because then we can all deter each other. It is demonstrably true that possession of nuclear weapons is not a deterrent to other nations acquiring them. But it is supposed to deter other nations from using them. In which case, surely the more the merrier, so we can all deter each other.
The madness of the argument is self-evident. We are borrowing hundreds of billions we cannot afford for Trident, yet in all the reams of analysis of what to do about North Korea, Trident never gets a mention. It is a system entirely useless even in the one situation in which it was supposed to be effective.
How did we get here? In the 1950s the USA dropped 635,000 tonnes of bombs on North Korea including 35,000 tonnes of napalm. The US killed an estimated 20% of the North Korean population. For comparison, approximately 2% of the UK population was killed during World War II.
That this massive destruction of North Korea resulted in a xenophobic, American-hating state with an obsession with developing powerful weapons systems to ensure national survival, is not exactly surprising.