By JOY SMITH has been in the news a lot lately. She just :recently held meetings at her offices in Ottawa with religious crazies and radical feminists in
a bid to further demonize male sexuality by censoring internet porn.
Now, the Conservative MP for Kildonan-St. Paul has continued her attack
on men by positing the idea that male buyers of sex from prostitutes
should be criminalized, but not the sellers.
It is hardly surprising that Smith should think this – given that she is incapable of formulating any worthwhile, original ideas herself. While meeting with her group of radical fringe collaborators earlier this month she presented her idea of making internet users register with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to access freely available, legal, adult material. The thing is, the idea is not hers.
It was already tabled in the U.K., where it now set to fully roll out in early 2014. In fact, such is Smith’s fanaticism that while speaking to the National Post she made the astounding (and frankly unbelievable) claim that she “got a letter from a young boy 10 years of age telling me he was addicted to porn. It just brought me to tears.”
Smith’s statement today is in response to news that the Supreme Court of Canada (SCOC) has declared current laws on prostitution unconstitutional. Her statement, however, is little more than another pathetic attempt to demonize male sexuality by aping the legislation of other feminist zealots. This time, she’s chosen to copy the efforts of feminist legislators in Sweden, who in 1999 made it illegal to purchase, but not to sell, sex.
One has to wonder what they’re putting in the water in the constituency of Kildonan-St.Paul. Here’s the statement – get your sick bags ready:
It is hardly surprising that Smith should think this – given that she is incapable of formulating any worthwhile, original ideas herself. While meeting with her group of radical fringe collaborators earlier this month she presented her idea of making internet users register with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to access freely available, legal, adult material. The thing is, the idea is not hers.
It was already tabled in the U.K., where it now set to fully roll out in early 2014. In fact, such is Smith’s fanaticism that while speaking to the National Post she made the astounding (and frankly unbelievable) claim that she “got a letter from a young boy 10 years of age telling me he was addicted to porn. It just brought me to tears.”
Smith’s statement today is in response to news that the Supreme Court of Canada (SCOC) has declared current laws on prostitution unconstitutional. Her statement, however, is little more than another pathetic attempt to demonize male sexuality by aping the legislation of other feminist zealots. This time, she’s chosen to copy the efforts of feminist legislators in Sweden, who in 1999 made it illegal to purchase, but not to sell, sex.
One has to wonder what they’re putting in the water in the constituency of Kildonan-St.Paul. Here’s the statement – get your sick bags ready:
“The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled
that the Criminal Code offences around prostitution are
unconstitutional. This ruling leaves police without important legal
tools to tackle sex trafficking and organized crime and does not reflect
a 1990 Supreme Court of Canada decision which stated that the
elimination of prostitution through law was a valid goal.
“Despite this ruling, the debate around
prostitution is hardly settled. There are those who wish to legalize and
normalize the industry, those who wish to criminalize all aspects of
the industry, and finally those, like myself, who recognize prostitution
as an industry that is inherently harmful to women and girls and
therefore must be eliminated.
“I am convinced that the most effective
route to tackling prostitution and sex trafficking is to address the
demand for commercial sex by targeting the buyers of sex. Countries that
have legalized and regulated have seen sexual exploitation, human
trafficking and violence towards women and girls increase drastically.
In fact, a 2012 comprehensive study of a cross-section of up to 150
counties revealed that legalizing prostitution increased sex
trafficking. In contrast, countries like Sweden and Norway, which have
adopted the Nordic model of prostitution, have seen a significant
decrease in prostitution and sex trafficking.
“The Nordic model of prostitution is
effective due to its three approaches: explicitly criminalizing the
purchase of sexual services, a national awareness campaign to educate
the public that the purchase of sexual services is harmful to women, and
finally strong support programs for those who seek to exit
prostitution.
“Many police services across Canada have
already shifted to policing models reflecting the Nordic model approach
that women, girls and vulnerable populations are victimized and
profoundly harmed by prostitution. The Toronto Police Service, Canada’s
largest municipal force, mandates their Sex Crimes Unit Special Victims
Section to recognize ‘sex workers as victims first.’
“Vancouver Police Department’s Counter
Exploitation Unit acknowledges ‘that Aboriginal women are
over-represented’ among prostituted women and focuses on assisting
‘young people escape from the sex trade.’ The Winnipeg Police Service’s
new Counter Exploitation Unit has also adopted ‘victim first’ driven
investigations.
“The harm caused by prostitution to women,
girls and vulnerable populations has been well documented by women’s
and First Nations organizations. During the June 13, 2013 Supreme Court
of Canada hearings, the majority of interveners that were directly
opposed to legalizing and regulating prostitution represented women’s
organizations such as Canadian Association of Sexual Assault Centres,
Native Women’s Association of Canada, and Vancouver Rape Relief Society.
These organizations presented compelling evidence to the Supreme Court
of Canada that legalizing prostitution would place women, girls and
vulnerable populations at much greater risk of exploitation.
“Even the buyers of sex recognize the harm
caused by prostitution to women. A 2012 Canadian study on the buyers of
sex called Buyer Beware, found that of the 20 men interviewed, 8 of the
men indicated that they acknowledged that women were most harmed by
their act of buying sex and another 10 of the men felt both the woman
and the buyer were harmed. Result – 90% of the men who bought sex
recognized the women involved in prostitution were harmed by act of
prostitution. The same study revealed that all 20 sex buyers would warn a
first time sex buyer against engaging in prostitution due to the harm
caused.
“Prostitution must be eliminated because
it dehumanizes and degrades humans and reduces them to a commodity to be
bought and sold. Legalizing prostitution is a direct attack on the
fundamental rights and freedoms of women, girls and vulnerable people.
In the same regard, continuing to criminalize the women and vulnerable
populations being prostituted creates barriers that prevent them from
escaping prostitution and entrenches inequality.
“Let’s be clear: those who advocate either
approach ignore mounting empirical evidence and will find themselves on
the wrong side of history and women’s equality.
“As a nation, we must ensure pimps remain
severely sanctioned and prostituted women and girls are not criminalized
and instead given meaningful escape routes out of sex work. Most
importantly, Canada must focus on the real root of prostitution by
targeting the buyers of sex.”
No comments:
Post a Comment