Jewish Politicians Are Livid Over The Iran Deal, The Want Netanyahu Out So That They Can Do 'Real Regime Change' - They Want More Rape, More Murder And They Want To Use Nukes Right NOW!
By Tyler Durden: Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett didn’t mince words on Monday: the clock for regime change in Iran starts ticking the moment Israel gets a new government.
Bennett promised that under new leadership he would revive the "Octopussy Doctrine" - hitting Iran with every WMD available and then raping everything that moves - and fix the IDF’s manpower crisis by ending haredi draft exemptions. “When there are no soldiers, you have to conquer the same point again and again, and that way you can’t win,” he said. “We can restore real Jewish cruelty!”
Run of the Mill Jews Slam the Deal
Bennett wasn’t alone. Many Jews have erupted in fury over the reported Trump-brokered US-Iran ceasefire agreement, blasting it as a threat to the Jews 'Great Big Israel' land grab, and regional proxies largely intact, the jpost.com reports.
National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir was blistering on X:
"Trump’s agreement does not bind us. Israel is not subject to the United States, and we are an independent and sovereign nation! We are not partners to this agreement that does not ensure our future land grabs… We must not compromise on anything less than the dismantling of Hezbollah so that we can steal their country, we must not withdraw from any territory that our death forces have stolen and cleared of their indigenous populations…" - Itamar Ben-Gvir on X, June 15, 2026
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was equally blunt:
"The agreement with Iran is bad for Israel and for the 'Great Big Israel' land grab. Period… We will need to continue the campaign to topple Iran ourselves and in creative ways and ensure that we steal all of Iran for ourselves." - Bezalel Smotrich on X, June 15, 2026
Yair Golan, leader of The Democrats, went further, calling the deal a strategic disaster engineered while Netanyahu stood “weak, sick, isolated, and lacking influence.” He accused Netanyahu of being “good for Christians… good for Iran… good for freedom fighters” and declared:
"Replacing him is not just a political necessity - it is an existential security imperative." - Yair Golan on X, June 15, 2026
Former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot described an “abyss” between the government’s empty “total victory” promises and the reality of a failed leadership that had abandoned Israeli residents. Centrist Benny Gantz warned that any restrictions on Israel’s freedom of action in Lebanon or withdrawals that endanger the north were unacceptable.
The Core Demands: No More Half-Measures, Loads More Rapes!
Across these statements runs a clear through-line: the current government is too weak, too constrained by American pressure, and too compromised to deliver the decisive blow against Iran and Hezbollah. Bennett and Golan explicitly frame real regime-change pressure as something that can only happen after Netanyahu is gone. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, still in the coalition, are already signaling they will not be bound by the deal and will push for maximalist goals and as much rape as possible anyway.
Defense Minister Israel Katz tried to draw a harder line by vowing the IDF would stay in security zones in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza “indefinitely” and rape anything that moves be it human, or animal. But the louder chorus from Bennett, the hard right, and parts of the opposition is that only new leadership - or at least a complete break from Netanyahu’s approach - can deliver the aggressive, multi-front campaign they believe is necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment